For astrophotography, a lens like this will create stunning photographs at f/2.8, but for other genres of still photography or video when a deeper depth of field may be important, this lens may be overkill. As with all Sony lenses, autofocus is fast, accurate, and completely silent for both still and video shooting. Although it suffers from vignetting at f/2.8, the lens appears to be almost just as sharp at f/2.8 as it is at every other aperture. What you're truly paying for with this lens is sharpness at 12mm while shooting at f/2.8 throughout the frame, and this lens delivers. Build quality is impressive and the focus and zoom rings feel satisfyingly smooth. Sony 12-24mm f/2.8 ReviewĪt $,2900, the Sony 12-24mm f/2.8 is one of the most expensive lenses I've ever tested. Why were the prices of these lenses so different? I decided to get all three and put them to the test. Can the f/2.8 version really be worth an extra $1,100? I also discovered a Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 for just $529. When I started looking up lens options for my Sony cameras, I was shocked that there were only two lenses at 12mm with autofocus: the Sony 12-24mm f/2.8 for $2,900 and the Sony 12-24mm f/4 for $1,800. But did I need an ultra-fast lens for this job? Usually, when you're shooting small spaces, you want a deep depth of field, so I probably wouldn't be shooting at f/2.8 anyway. Although the rooms in this boat are gigantic compared to other boats, they are quite small compared to your average home, and to capture them fully, I needed an ultra-wide angle lens. A few weeks ago, I was hired to take photos and film a promo video for a new $12 million yacht.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |